Jump to content

mkgg

Member
  • Content Count

    61
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

mkgg last won the day on October 17 2015

mkgg had the most liked content!

About mkgg

  • Rank
    Member

Recent Profile Visitors

1,286 profile views
  1. Get artificial tears drops, i had eye surgery and they were prescribed for dryness but now whenever they get tired, i use them and they feel a lot better. Also if you can take a 5 minute break every hour, you can work for a lot longer if you take mini-breaks.
  2. Well for starters, that signature link you dropped isn't doing you any good (at all)
  3. My point of the thread was this guy outing a network because he couldn't rank himself - doesn't matter if the network is shitty and wasn't helping or majestic, the poor guy(s) utilizing the network will get penalized. And the OP will still not be able to rank but he ruined some people(s) day or life's work. PBN are nothing more than websites designed to rank other websites, they can be huge websites earning money on their own but ultimately nothing more than glorified PBNs. The big-ass companies run these big-ass PBNs, viperchill wrote an amazing article on this about how these big compan
  4. https://productforums.google.com/forum/#!topic/webmasters/X8m8PQfQwqI/discussion https://www.seroundtable.com/google-spam-links-benefit-24082.html What he fails to realize is when Google improves and pushes an update that better targets PBNs, he will be the first one whining. Like he thinks Google gives a crap about his pathetic existence, after the huge fine, google is out to get that money back, the only reason Johnmu replied was cause of the title. Google probably searches for the words "PBN" on their forum and his juicy post deserved some attention.
  5. I guess i haven't been clear. Here is the complete picture of one keyword (and it's the same story for all keywords) I built the spammy links in April - before that you can see the original rank it had for months and years (i am only showing from feb), it took a few weeks but you can see the big drop for every thing the site ranked for (Google WMT showed 30-40 but most keywords were dropped to 80-90 position). I don't think it's a devalued spam link, if that was the case it should have gone back to its original rank when the link was devalued but it did the opposite, dropping 80-90 p
  6. Have you seen recoveries though and if there's any residual effect ?. That is what i am wondering about if google is keeping a history of algorithmic punishments and treating new links with more suspicion. It makes sense for them to do that but they could just as well not care if a site is recovered, i bet sites get rank losses all the time from bad link just not as pronounced so they're probably not tracking it. I guess i'll find out
  7. Has anyone seen complete recovery of their sites after it was punished? Back in April, mine was punished (my fault, i built links from spam sites), it ranked pretty well actually for a few weeks before getting the hammer. I removed those links and it's back in June (Average position below) However as you can see, it's not a full recovery. Some of my keywords have gone back to their exact position as before but most are well below where they used to be. And i also got to ask is this site worth working on anymore ? or should i dump it and make a new one ? I don't know if any new l
  8. I bought tumblr account years back based on PR and they didn't have any impact. Also, aren't tumblr links completely useless now that they modify the links like twitter does?
  9. No no, that's not what i am saying. I just had the site showing featured snippet, of course never ignore good site structure. That would be crazy, the only reason i can even survive in this niche is other websites have no clue about seo, they have just lucked out with old ass sites with natural links built over time. You guys here obviously know far more than me and have better PBNs etc, anyone decides to dive in and its game-over for me. But i'll tell you this, it has links from billion dollar government organizations websites so the links are very powerful, PR8-9 sites. It doesn'
  10. Would you advise good site structure when competing against link powerhouses of sites? Just to give you an idea, this is what i've to compete with http://imgur.com/a/LSRTJ I agree about the good site structure but a bad site with good links is still gonna win. And this is the whole point of my post, G has lied to us so much about content that people still think its the only thing that matters and you will just magically rank. Look at google fred, a lot of innocent sites have been punished but no comments from them to help them recover, i think they're a bunch of douchebags no matter
  11. WARNING: Has some rants I understand why Google have to lie but now i seriously believe the people they choose are chosen based on their complete lack of morality and how well they can lie. From my time here and somewhat positive experiences with link-building, i understood the puzzle a little bit and this is what i believed - links help but yes the content does matter slightly, spun or bullshit content won't rank even with the best links. I am sure i am not alone in believing that, the content lies have been spread so well, how "RankBrain" is so smart etc. Back in November last yea
  12. So if anyone is interested what happened, it was indeed google figuring out the site (content different from old site) and has stopped disappearing my pages. Some of them have come back, lower than their old rank. I also learned a thing called sticky posts in wordpress (dunno if theme specific) so i can keep my best posts at top. Oh and i love the domain, can't believe i found such an amazing site and i was gonna use it as a pbn!
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.