ThomasBelknap Posted October 22, 2016 Share Posted October 22, 2016 No doubt these people are Clinton supporters. Thanks Robert. http://www.breitbart.com/tech/2016/10/21/university-florida-offer-counseling-students-offended-halloween-costumes/ Khemosabi 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
whateverpedia Posted October 23, 2016 Share Posted October 23, 2016 Bigots, racists, misogynists, religious fanatics, conspiracy nuts.........most are voting for Trump. I'm not saying most Trump supporters are ignorant. But if you are ignorant...I know who you are probably voting for. Although it is not true that all conservatives are stupid people, it is true that most stupid people are conservative. John Stuart Mill Claude Whitacre 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
yukon Posted October 23, 2016 Share Posted October 23, 2016 No doubt these people are Clinton supporters. Thanks Robert. http://www.breitbart.com/tech/2016/10/21/university-florida-offer-counseling-students-offended-halloween-costumes/ ThomasBelknap 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mki Posted October 23, 2016 Author Share Posted October 23, 2016 Trump Lands his First Major News Paper Endorsement! ... Las Vegas-Review Journal ? All right ... http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/302372-trump-lands-first-major-newspaper-endorsement TLThe1&Only 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mki Posted October 23, 2016 Author Share Posted October 23, 2016 SNL: Debate #3 For extra LOLs, when she's holding the card, press pause and read the rest of the card. TLThe1&Only and Claude Whitacre 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kay king Posted October 23, 2016 Share Posted October 23, 2016 http://insider.foxnews.com/2016/10/20/84-rejected-clinton-campaign-slogans-revealed-wikileaks 85 tries to get a campaign slogan - and that's the best they could do? wow Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TLThe1&Only Posted October 23, 2016 Share Posted October 23, 2016 yukon 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TLThe1&Only Posted October 23, 2016 Share Posted October 23, 2016 POLITICS Cartoonists From 12 Countries Illustrated Trump, And The Results Are Devastatingly Accurate http://occupydemocrats.com/2016/03/13/cartoonists-12-countries-illustrated-trump-results-devastatingly-accurate/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Claude Whitacre Posted October 23, 2016 Share Posted October 23, 2016 Nate Silver now has the chances of winning at; Clinton 87.4% Trump 12.6% Trump still says he's ahead in the polls. Losing is the new winning. Yesterday (I think) he said that after the election...he's going to sue the women that accused him of inappropriate sexual advancement. Think about this...the President Of The United States...suing women in court, for accusing him falsely of unwanted sexual advances. Had someone a year ago suggested this would be said by a presidential front runner, nobody ...nobody would have believed it. The far right would have said it was a lie. But now, my guess is that most of Trump's supporters are thinking, "Sure, sue the bitches. I would. That's what I'd expect...from the President". Anything said will be accepted, as long as it's said by the person on your side. Either side. Humans. TLThe1&Only 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mki Posted October 23, 2016 Author Share Posted October 23, 2016 ABC - Clinton +12 - http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/clinton-vaults-double-digit-lead-boosted-broad-disapproval/story?id=42993821 IBD - Trump +2 (Poll is weighted, see the footer) www.investors.com/politics/ibd-tipp-presidential-election-poll/ No idea why they're weighting 282/226/259? I have no idea where they got these weights from, it's not cited and isn't consistent with anything I've personally seen. Gallup: R: 27%, I 40%, D 32% http://www.gallup.com/poll/15370/party-affiliation.aspx So... 258/217/322 sure? Why is there always some baloney going on with the polls where Trump is winning? Raw data C +7 to +12, margin of error 3%. Any time Trump is up there's "Magic number theory", inconsistent weights, or skewed sampling. If IBT wants their poll to be credible, explain how you came up with the weights, is it really that much to ask? Also, how did they manage to get 254 Democrats/254 Republicans/259 Independents to respond?Or did they poll 282/226/259 and suggested that data was "weighted." If so, 254/254/259 is certainly not a reasonable. Edit: After digging in a little bit deeper and checking their other data, they are not misrepresenting their unweighted data as far as I can tell, but their weighting makes no sense. It seems to vary day to day, meaning they could just be manipulating the weights to manufacture what ever number they want. With out disclosure of the methodology, this poll is worthless. :Crumples Paper in to a Ball and throws it in the garbage can: TLThe1&Only 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
yukon Posted October 23, 2016 Share Posted October 23, 2016 Pardon me, there's a hair on your toast. ThomasBelknap and TLThe1&Only 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mki Posted October 23, 2016 Author Share Posted October 23, 2016 Pardon me, there's a hair on your toast. New SEO Technique: Come up with a BS poll where Trump is winning by 5% and spread it all over the internet. Get one person from each state so you can call it a "national poll of all 50 states", then just dial these area codes until you get to like 750. Might be worth it if you can get a bunch of links from media sites like foxnews.com Go go freelancer.com Abilene area code 325 Allen area code 972/469/214 Alvin area code 281/832/346/713 Amarillo area code 806 Arlington area code 817/682/214 Atascocita area code 281/832/346/713 Austin area code 512/737 Baytown area code 281/832/346/713 Beaumont area code 409 Bedford area code 817/682 Benbrook area code 817/682 Big Spring area code 432 Brownsville area code 956 Bryan area code 979 Burleson area code 817/682 Carrollton area code 972/469/214 Cedar Hill area code 972/469/214 Cedar Park area code 512/737 Channelview area code 281/832/346/713 Cleburne area code 817/682 Cloverleaf area code 281/832/346/713 College Station area code 979 Conroe area code 936 Coppell area code 972/469/214 Copperas Cove area code 254 Corpus Christi area code 361 Corsicana area code 903 Dallas area code 972/469/214 Deer Park area code 281/832/346/713 Del Rio area code 830 Denison area code 903 Denton area code 940 Desoto area code 972/469/214 Duncanville area code 972/469/214 Eagle Pass area code 830 Edinburg area code 956 El Paso area code 915 Euless area code 817/682 Farmers Branch area code 972/469/214 Flower Mound area code 972/469/214 Fort Hood area code 254 Fort Worth area code 817/682 Friendswood area code 281/832/346/713 Frisco area code 972/469/214 Galveston area code 409 Garland area code 972/469/214 Georgetown area code 512/737 Grand Prairie area code 972/469/214 Grapevine area code 817/682 Greenville area code 903 Haltom City area code 817/682 Harlingen area code 956 Houston area code 281/832/346/713 Huntsville area code 936 Hurst area code 817/682 Irving area code 972/469/214 Keller area code 817/682 Kerrville area code 830 Killeen area code 254 Kingsville area code 361 La Porte area code 281/832/346/713 Lake Jackson area code 979 Lancaster area code 972/469/214 Laredo area code 956 League City area code 281/832/346/713 Lewisville area code 940/972/469/214 Longview area code 903 Lubbock area code 806 Lufkin area code 936 Mansfield area code 817/682 Marshall area code 903 Mcallen area code 956 Mckinney area code 972/469/214 Mesquite area code 972/469/214 Midland area code 432 Mission area code 956 Mission Bend area code 281/832/346/713 Missouri City area code 281/832/346/713 Nacogdoches area code 936 New Braunfels area code 830 North Richland Hills area code 817/682 Odessa area code 432 Paris area code 903 Pasadena area code 281/832/346/713 Pearland area code 281/832/346/713 Pharr area code 956 Plainview area code 806 Plano area code 972/469/214 Port Arthur area code 409 Richardson area code 972/469/214 Rosenberg area code 281/832/346/713 Round Rock area code 512/737 Rowlett area code 972/469/214 San Angelo area code 325 San Antonio area code 210 San Benito area code 956 San Juan area code 956 San Marcos area code 512/737 Seguin area code 830 Sherman area code 903 Socorro area code 915 Southlake area code 817/682 Spring area code 281/832/346/713 Sugar Land area code 281/832/346/713 Temple area code 254 Texarkana area code 903 Texas City area code 409 The Colony area code 972/469/214 The Woodlands area code 281/832/346/713 Tyler area code 903 University Park area code 972/469/214 Victoria area code 361 Waco area code 254 Watauga area code 817/682 Waxahachie area code 972/469/214 Weslaco area code 956 Wichita Falls area code 940 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
whateverpedia Posted October 23, 2016 Share Posted October 23, 2016 Humans. Proof beyond all reasonable doubt that there is no God. No all powerful, all knowledgable, perfect being would ever make something as deeply flawed as humans and then put them at the top of the food chain. The human race can only be an accident of nature. Lanfear63 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TLThe1&Only Posted October 23, 2016 Share Posted October 23, 2016 The Electoral College back in the spotlight? http://thehill.com/blogs/congress-blog/presidential-campaign/302230-the-electoral-college-back-in-the-spotlight Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lanfear63 Posted October 23, 2016 Share Posted October 23, 2016 Proof beyond all reasonable doubt that there is no God. No all powerful, all knowledgable, perfect being would ever make something as deeply flawed as humans and then put them at the top of the food chain. The human race can only be an accident of nature. Donald Trump would say, "No", it just proves that God was a woman. TLThe1&Only 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TLThe1&Only Posted October 23, 2016 Share Posted October 23, 2016 Nasty Pilot and 5 others liked this Lisa Bloom (Gloria Allred's daughter)23 hours ago If Trump sues accusers we then have subpoena power to require not only Trump but all his enablers to appear for depositions. A field day. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
whateverpedia Posted October 23, 2016 Share Posted October 23, 2016 it just proves that God was a woman. A nasty one? TLThe1&Only and Claude Whitacre 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TLThe1&Only Posted October 23, 2016 Share Posted October 23, 2016 Proof beyond all reasonable doubt that there is no God. No all powerful, all knowledgable, perfect being would ever make something as deeply flawed as humans and then put them at the top of the food chain. The human race can only be an accident of nature. LOL! Hard to believe this is all some sort of accident and IMHO its not the creators fault it decided to allow us to have free will. It unselfishly allowed us to have free will because a bunch of robots is no fun. Therein lies the problem. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lanfear63 Posted October 23, 2016 Share Posted October 23, 2016 A nasty one? I will email you the rest from my private server: @HillaryClinton.com, Should be secure whateverpedia 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TLThe1&Only Posted October 23, 2016 Share Posted October 23, 2016 Although it is not true that all conservatives are stupid people, it is true that most stupid people are conservative. John Stuart Mill I wonder if this study has any answers? From TUESDAY, JUL 29, 2014 Secrets of the right-wing brain: New study proves it — conservatives see a different, hostile world Phony WMD, Benghazi, birthers, truthers -- turns out there's a scientific explanation for deniers and Tea Partyers http://www.salon.com/2014/07/29/secrets_of_the_right_wing_brain_new_study_proves_it_conservatives_see_a_different_hostile_world/?utm_source=twitter&utm_medium=socialflow whateverpedia 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TLThe1&Only Posted October 23, 2016 Share Posted October 23, 2016 I was eating Chips Ahoy cookies when it saw this -thanks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ThomasBelknap Posted October 23, 2016 Share Posted October 23, 2016 Would everyone be crying if Trump had called some man a "nasty man"? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ThomasBelknap Posted October 23, 2016 Share Posted October 23, 2016 Yesterday (I think) he said that after the election...he's going to sue the women that accused him of inappropriate sexual advancement. Think about this...the President Of The United States...suing women in court, for accusing him falsely of unwanted sexual advances. Had someone a year ago suggested this would be said by a presidential front runner, nobody ...nobody would have believed it. The far right would have said it was a lie. But now, my guess is that most of Trump's supporters are thinking, "Sure, sue the bitches. I would. That's what I'd expect...from the President". Anything said will be accepted, as long as it's said by the person on your side. Either side. Humans. The President or nominee shouldn't pursue legal actions against people who he says falsely accused him? Do you think everyone should not defend themselves legally? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sbucciarel Posted October 23, 2016 Share Posted October 23, 2016 Would everyone be crying if Trump had called some man a "nasty man"? How Donald Trump Accidentally Created The Nasty Woman Economy When Donald Trump called Hillary Clinton a “nasty woman” in Wednesday’s debate, he didn’t mean it as a compliment. But subsequently, many women have been embracing the term — if Clinton is nasty, well they want to be nasty, too. T-shirts, tote bags, mugs and even a perfume have sprung up for sale on the Internet (including some products for men) that spin Trump’s slam to celebrate what they think Clinton exemplifies: female ambition, intelligence, power and action. “I kept thinking about that comment after the debate, and how the phrase now has a totally different meaning,” says Elizabeth Holliday, the lead designer at e-commerce site Swanky Press. “It has morphed from the insult that Trump intended to a badge of honor for accomplished women.” After Donald Trump called Hillary Clinton a “nasty woman,” women and retailers have embraced the name. (Courtesy of NastyGal) In a way that might be aggravating to Trump, the proof of this “nasty” movement can be seen by the measure he seems to care about the most: the money. TLThe1&Only 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ThomasBelknap Posted October 23, 2016 Share Posted October 23, 2016 Suzanne, how does that answer my question? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts